<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QR Code vs Semacode</title>
	<link>http://www.sabre23t.com/20050507/qr-code-cellphone/</link>
	<description>my random thoughts on computers, engineering, transportation, society and blogging</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: rbl</title>
		<link>http://www.sabre23t.com/20050507/qr-code-cellphone/#comment-3051</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 23:55:19 +0800</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sabre23t.com/20050507/qr-code-cellphone/#comment-3051</guid>
					<description>Semacode ist the way to go. Since it's an open standard, more projects are likely to use it, and more and more already do so.
Cell phone companies are also more likely to implement it since there are no fees. (Hope they will supply readers by default soon!)
I do embrace Semacode. And, btw, I think its esthetically more pleasing since its look is more &quot;neutral&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Semacode ist the way to go. Since it&#8217;s an open standard, more projects are likely to use it, and more and more already do so.<br />
Cell phone companies are also more likely to implement it since there are no fees. (Hope they will supply readers by default soon!)<br />
I do embrace Semacode. And, btw, I think its esthetically more pleasing since its look is more &#8220;neutral&#8221;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
